两种疲劳方案对落地时下肢运动学和冲击力时频特征的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(11772201,11302131),上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(14YZ125),教育部博士点基金项目(20123156120003)


Effects of two fatigue protocols on lower extremity kinematics and time/frequency-domain characteristics of impact forces during drop landing
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较两种疲劳方案对人体落地动作下肢关节运动学及冲击力时/频域特征的影响。方法 选取15名优秀跑、跳类专项男性运动员,利用Vicon运动捕捉系统和Kistler三维测力台比较两种疲劳方案(恒速跑、折返跑+垂直纵跳)前后落地时矢、额状面运动学和地面反作用力(ground reaction force, GRF)时/频域特征。结果 (1)两种疲劳方案均会造成髋、膝关节在矢状面上的角度减小、屈曲活动度增加,且采用跑+跳方案时踝关节屈曲活动度、膝关节最大屈曲角速度增加(P<0.05),髋关节外展活动度以及髋、膝关节最大外展角速度增加(P<0.05);(2)两种疲劳方案前后,冲击力时域特征均无显著差异;采用跑和跑+跳方案,分别在3.51、8.20 Hz及1.17、3.51、7.03 Hz下表现出GRF频谱振幅减小(P<0.05)。结论 两种疲劳方案均会导致下肢在受到落地冲击时更多采用屈曲着地方式,但跑+跳方案表现更明显且干预时间更短,从实验方法学角度更具优势。研究结果可为研究疲劳后的力特征提供进一步参考。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the influence of two fatigue protocols on kinematics of lower extremities as well as time/frequency-domain characteristics of impact force during human landing. Methods A total of 15 trained male athletes (sprint/jumping events) were selected and their kinematics in sagittal/frontal plane and time/frequency-domain characteristics of ground reaction force (GRF) under pre- and post-fatigue conditions with two fatigue protocols (constant speed running, shuttle running + vertical jumping) were collected by the Vicon motion capture system and Kistler 3D force plates. Results (1) Both fatigue protocols showed a significant decrease in the angle of hip and knee joints on the sagittal plane, and an increase in the flexion range of motion (ROM). The running + jumping fatigue protocol showed a significant increase in the flexion ROM of ankle joint, the maximum flexion angular velocity of knee joint (P<0.05), the abduction ROM of hip joint and the maximum abduction angular velocity of hip and knee joints (P<0.05). (2) No significant differences were found in time/frequency-domain characteristics of impact force between pre- and post-tests for both fatigue protocols. The running and running + jumping fatigue protocols showed lower amplitude spectra of the GRF in the frequency domain at 3.51, 8.20 Hz and 1.17, 3.51, 7.03 Hz, respectively (P<0.05). Conclusions Both fatigue protocols can induce a more flexed landing posture of lower extremities under the impact of landing, and the running + jumping fatigue protocol shows a better effect with shorter intervention time, which indicates such fatigue protocol has more advantages from the perspective of experimental methodology. The research findings can provide further references for studying force characteristics after fatigue.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

夏锐,张希妮,傅维杰.两种疲劳方案对落地时下肢运动学和冲击力时频特征的影响[J].医用生物力学,2017,32(5):427-435

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-08
  • 最后修改日期:2016-09-01
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-10-25
  • 出版日期:
关闭