颈椎前路椎间盘切除减压融合术后颈椎旋转扳法的生物力学影响分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.上海中医药大学附属曙光医院石氏伤科医学中心;2.上海中医药大学附属曙光医院放射科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Analysis of the Biomechanical Impact of Cervical Rotation Manipulation after ACDF Surgery
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Shi'2.'3.s Center of Orthopedics and Traumatology,Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine;4.Institute of Traumatology Orthopedics,Shanghai Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine;5.Radiology Department,Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探究颈椎前路椎间盘切除减压融合术(ACDF)术后应用颈椎旋转扳法治疗的生物力学安全性,为临床治疗提供理论依据。方法 基于CT数据建立正常C0-T1颈椎三维有限元模型,并以此为基础构建颈椎C5-6节段ACDF术后模型,在两种模型的C4、C7节段分别模拟颈椎旋转扳法,并分析比较两种模型在C4、C7节段手法加载下椎体、双侧关节突关节、椎间盘及内固定系统的von Mises应力情况。结果 在对C4节段进行手法加载时,ACDF术后模型的C5、C6和C7椎体应力较正常模型分别下降了12.3%、11.5%、26.4%,双侧关节突关节应力均呈现下降趋势,其中C4-5、C5-6、C6-7节段左侧关节突关节应力分别下降了12.3%、58.8%、15.4%,右侧关节突关节应力分别下降了16.6%、92.1%、17.2%,在椎间盘应力方面,C4-5和C6-7节段椎间盘应力较正常模型分别下降13.2%、4.0%,而C5-6节段融合器、钛板和螺钉的最大应力分别为9.349MPa、111.9MPa和300.8MPa。在对C7节段进行手法加载时,ACDF术后模型的C4、C5和C6椎体应力较正常模型显著增加,尤其是C5椎体,其应力增加了近18倍,同时除了C4-5节段左侧关节突关节应力上升57.7%外,其余节段的双侧关节突关节应力普遍下降与C4节段实施手法加载时趋势一致,但其C4-5和C6-7节段椎间盘应力较正常模型分别增加43.2%、21.7%,且C5-6节段融合器、钛板和螺钉的应力分别为2.926MPa、205.4MPa和256.2MPa。结论 ACDF术后于融合节段上位椎体行手法的安全性相对较高,但融合节段下位椎体行手法可能导致应力集中,增加损伤风险。在实施术后保守治疗时,应考虑手法操作的安全性和适应症,避免在高风险区域进行操作,同时基于患者具体术后生物力学的状态实施更为精准、安全的手法干预治疗。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the biomechanical safety of applying traditional Chinese orthopedic manipulation therapy after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery, providing a theoretical basis for clinical treatment in biomechanics.Methods Based on CT data, a three-dimensional finite element model of the normal C0-T1 cervical spine was established, and an ACDF postoperative finite element model of the C5-6 segment was constructed on this basis. Cervical spine rotation manipulation were simulated at the C4 and C7 segments of both models, and the von Mises stress of the vertebral body, bilateral facet joints, intervertebral discs, and internal fixation system under manipulation loading of the C4 and C7 segments in both models were compared and analyzed.Results The study found that when the C4 segment was manipulated, the stress on the C5, C6, and C7 vertebral bodies in the ACDF postoperative model decreased by 12.3%, 11.5%, and 26.4% respectively compared to the normal model. The stress on the bilateral facet joints showed a downward trend, with the stress on the left facet joints of the C4-5, C5-6, and C6-7 segments decreasing by 12.3%, 58.8%, and 15.4% respectively, and the stress on the right facet joints decreasing by 16.6%, 92.1%, and 17.2%. In terms of intervertebral disc stress, the stress on the C4-5 and C6-7 segments decreased by 13.2% and 4.0% , while the maximum stress of the fusion cage, titanium plate, and screws in the C5-6 segment were 9.349MPa, 111.9MPa, and 300.8MPa respectively. When the C7 segment was manipulated, the stress on the C4, C5, and C6 vertebral bodies in the ACDF postoperative model increased significantly compared to the normal model, especially the C5 vertebral body, with an increase of nearly 18 times. Except for the stress on the left facet joint of the C4-5 segment increasing by 57.7%, the stress on the bilateral facet joints of other segments generally decreased, consistent with the trend when the C4 segment was manipulated, but the stress on the C4-5 and C6-7 segments increased by 43.2% and 21.7% respectively compared to the normal model, and the stress on the fusion cage, titanium plate, and screws in the C5-6 segment were 2.926MPa, 205.4MPa, and 256.2MPa .Conclusion The safety of performing manipulation on the upper vertebral body of the fusion segment post-ACDF is relatively high, but performing manipulation on the lower vertebral body of the fusion segment may lead to stress concentration and increase the risk of injury. When implementing postoperative conservative treatment, the safety and indications of manipulation should be considered to avoid operations in high-risk areas, and more precise and safe manipulation intervention treatment should be implemented based on the specific postoperative biomechanical state of the patient.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-16
  • 最后修改日期:2024-09-02
  • 录用日期:2024-09-03
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
关闭